Help us reach millions of Spanish-speaking Americans

Prager

Help us reach millions of Spanish-speaking Americans who need to watch PragerU’s video with Gloria Alvarez.
Many of America’s legal and illegal immigrants fled nations that were ruined by corrupt politicians and failed government policies. But once here, they continue to support the same ideas. According to Pew Research, in the recent 2016 presidential election, 66% of Latinos voted for Hillary Clinton, who advocated for the same big government policies.

“Immigrants! Don’t Vote For What You Fled”
Click here to watch the video.

Keith Ablow: Donald Trump and the incredible power of psychological truth

By Dr. Keith Ablow Published March 03, 2017 FoxNews.com

As a healer, I help people accept stark truths about their lives and the lives of others. These truths and insights may call upon them to act boldly, often in spite of their own anxiety and despite the fact that others will experience pain.

Here’s an example: A young woman whose mother deserted her as a young girl and left her to be cared for by her alcoholic father might have convinced herself that her dad was her savior — even a saint. After all, what did she have to believe in, once her mother was gone? Even if her father was abusive to her, she might deny his shortcomings and what she suffered because of them.

Grappling with the fact that both her parents were untrustworthy would have been too much to bear at 9 or 10 years old. It would have turned her childhood into pure panic. But, as an adult, her healing may depend on my convincing her to accept what she really lived through — and to act boldly on those facts. Becoming a strong person who values herself and does not allow others to abuse her could require making very tough decisions. She might even have to sever her connection to her father, with all the pain on both sides of that equation.

I use the word equation intentionally, by the way. In some ways, seeing one’s life clearly requires an almost arithmetic assessment of it. If one’s father was no father, that’s how things add up — period. Pretending otherwise invites all manner of misinterpretation and self-sabotage, in many realms, all through life.

President Trump is practicing the political version of this arithmetic: psychological truth and healing. It is what it is.

When Trump tells the citizens of the United States that people who are in our country illegally and commit crimes must leave, he is the same as the therapist who tells a patient, “If your boyfriend is hitting you, you need to make him leave your apartment.” The breakup might result in sadness and anger, but that is no reason not to act.

When Trump says trade deals with the United States can’t be to the detriment of the U.S. economy, he is the corporate psychologist who tells a pair of business partners, “If one of you is trying to steal from the other, this isn’t a partnership, it’s a scam. That would make one of you a thief and the other a chump. And you both had better aspire to being more than that.”

When Trump tells our citizens that the borders of the United States need to be enforced vigorously, with a wall to defend the more porous of them, he is no different from the therapist who tells the owners of a house that is repeatedly robbed that they not only need to get an alarm system, but they also need to wonder why they don’t already have one. Because if they don’t value themselves enough to defend their property, that’s a much bigger problem than the robberies themselves.

It all adds up to what people do to prevent being victimized. It’s all arithmetic.

When Trump tells our citizens that companies that leave our country and American workers behind — and then sell their goods back into the United States — need to pay a price for their bad faith, he is no different from the sports psychologist who tells a team that its departing quarterback, who takes the team’s playbook with him mid-season, shouldn’t be able to walk back onto the field in another uniform, to a hero’s welcome. There’s got to be a price to pay for that betrayal, whether they once liked the guy or not. Otherwise, the team can start feeling like losers who deserve to be abandoned. And that can mean a really bad season, or even many bad seasons.

When Trump tells our citizens that states can’t choose to ignore federal drug and immigration laws and expect to receive financial support from the federal government, he is no different from the psychologist who tells the board of directors of a parent company that they need to stop funding subsidiaries that show utter contempt for corporate policies and procedures. Yes, it might be a tough stance that causes conflict, but what is the alternative? Anarchy that ends up eroding the credibility of the board and the very foundation of the corporation?

It all adds up to what a company is willing to do for cohesion and survival. It’s all arithmetic.

Healing or governing via psychological truth is not always pretty. Some of my patients’ most self-empowering decisions and actions set the stage for phenomenal periods of growth, but they also caused the most initial angst and brought the most sadness or conflict. But the alternative — self-doubt and self-destruction — was worse.

President Trump knows this truth, governs with it and, despite all the tough emotions it is bound to bring up along the way, can ultimately heal America with it.

Dr. Keith Ablow is a psychiatrist and member of the Fox News Medical A-Team.

Khalid Sheik Mohammed – how many know this?

The single most prominent characteristic of contemporary America is that
common sense has been abandoned to political correctness and “feelings.”

As President George W. Bush’s top speech writer, Marc Thiessen ( The Kelly
File on FOX ) was provided unique access to the CIA program used in
interrogating top Al Qaeda terrorists, including the mastermind of the 9/11
attack, Khalid Sheikh Mohammad (KSM).

Now, his riveting new book, Courting Disaster: How the CIA Kept America
Safe (Regnery), has been published. Here is an excerpt from Courting
Disaster:

“Just before dawn on March 1, 2003, two dozen heavily armed Pakistani
tactical assault forces move in and surround a safe house in Rawalpindi. A
few hours earlier they had received a text message from an informant inside
the house. It read: “I am with KSM.”

Bursting in, they find the disheveled mastermind of the 9/11 attacks,
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, in his bedroom. He is taken into custody. In the
safe house, they find a treasure trove of computers, documents, cell phones
and other valuable “pocket litter.”

Once in custody, KSM is defiant. He refuses to answer questions, informing
his captors that he will tell them everything when he gets to America and
sees his lawyer. But KSM is not taken to America to see a lawyer Instead
he is taken to a secret CIA “black site” in an undisclosed location.

Upon arrival, KSM finds himself in the complete control of Americans. He
does not know where he is, how long he will be there, or what his fate will
be. Despite his circumstances, KSM still refuses to talk. He spews
contempt at his interrogators, telling them Americans are weak, lack
resilience and are unable to do what is necessary to prevent the terrorists
from succeeding in their goals. He has trained to resist interrogation.
When he is asked for information about future attacks, he tells his
questioners scornfully: “Soon, you will know.”

It becomes clear he will not reveal the information using traditional
interrogation techniques. So he undergoes a series of “enhanced
interrogation techniques” approved for use only on the most high-value
detainees. The techniques include water boarding. He begins telling his CIA
de-briefers about active al Qaeda plots to launch attacks against the United
States and other Western targets. He holds classes for CIA officials, using
a chalkboard to draw a picture of al Qaeda’s operating structure,
financing, communications, and logistics. He identifies al Qaeda travel
routes and safe havens and helps intelligence officers make sense of
documents and computer records seized in terrorist raids. He identifies
voices in intercepted telephone calls, and helps officials understand the
meaning of coded terrorist communications. He provides information that
helps our intelligence community capture other high-ranking terrorists.

KSM’s questioning, and that of other captured terrorists, produces more than
6,000 intelligence reports, which are shared across the intelligence
community, as well as with our allies across the world. In one of these
reports, KSM describes in detail the revisions he made to his failed
1994-1995 plan known as the “Bojinka plot” to blow up a dozen airplanes
carrying some 4,000 passengers over the Pacific Ocean. Years later, an
observant CIA officer notices the activities of a cell being followed by
British authorities appear to match KSM’s description of his plans for a
Bojinka-style attack. In an operation that involves unprecedented
intelligence cooperation between our countries, British officials proceed to
unravel the plot.

On the night of Aug. 9, 2006, they launch a series of raids in a northeast
London suburb that lead to the arrest of two dozen al Qaeda terrorist
suspects. They find a USB thumb-drive in the pocket of one of the men with
security details for Heathrow airport, and information on seven
Trans-Atlantic flights that were scheduled to take off within hours of each
other:

* United Airlines Flight 931 to San Francisco departing at 2:15 PM
* Air Canada Flight 849 to Toronto departing at 3:00 PM
* Air Canada Flight 865 to Montreal departing at 3:15 PM
* United Airlines Flight 959 to Chicago departing at 3:40 PM
* United Airlines Flight 925 to Washington departing at 4:20 PM
* American Airlines Flight 131 to New York departing at 4:35 PM
* American Airlines Flight 91 to Chicago departing at 4:50 PM

They seize bomb-making equipment and hydrogen peroxide to make liquid
explosives. And they find the chilling martyrdom videos the suicide bombers
had prepared.

Today, if you asked an average person on the street what they know about the
2006 airlines plot, most would not be able to tell you much. Few Americans
are aware of the fact al Qaeda had planned to mark the fifth anniversary of
9/11 with an attack of similar scope and magnitude. And still fewer
realize the terrorists’ true intentions in this plot were uncovered thanks
to critical information obtained through the interrogation of the man who
conceived it: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

This is only one of the many attacks stopped with the help of the CIA
interrogation program established by the Bush Administration in the wake of
the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

In addition to helping break up these specific terrorist cells and plots,
CIA questioning provided our intelligence community with an unparalleled
body of information about al Qaeda.

Until the program was temporarily suspended in 2006, intelligence officials
say, well over half of the information our government had about al Qaeda-how
it operates, how it moves money, how it communicates, how it recruits
operatives, how it picks targets, how it plans and carries out attacks-came
from the interrogation of terrorists in CIA custody.

Former CIA Director George Tenet has declared: “I know this program has
saved lives. I know we’ve disrupted plots. I know this program alone is
worth more than what the FBI, the Central Intelligence Agency, and the
National Security Agency put together have been able to tell us.”

Former CIA Director Mike Hayden has said: “The facts of the case are that
the use of these techniques against these terrorists made us safer. It
really did work.” Even Barack Obama’s Director of National Intelligence,
Dennis Blair, has acknowledged: “High-value information came from
interrogations in which those methods were used and provided a deeper
understanding of the al Qaeda organization that was attacking this country.”
Leon Panetta, Obama’s CIA Director, has said: “Important information was
gathered from these detainees. It provided information that was acted upon.”

John Brennan, Obama’s Homeland Security Advisor, when asked in an interview
if enhanced-interrogation techniques were necessary to keep America safe,
replied: “Would the U. S. be handicapped if the CIA was not, in fact, able
to carry out these types of detention and debriefing activities, I would say
yes.”

On Jan. 22, 2009, President Obama issued Executive Order 13491, closing the
CIA program and directing that, henceforth, all interrogations by U. S.
personnel must follow the techniques contained in the Army Field Manual.

The morning of the announcement, Mike Hayden was still in his post as CIA
Director. He called White House Counsel Greg Craig and told him bluntly:
“You didn’t ask, but this is the CIA officially non-concurring.” The
president went ahead anyway, overruling the objections of the agency.

A few months later, on April 16, 2009, President Obama ordered the release
of four Justice Department memos that described in detail the techniques
used to interrogate KSM and other high-value terrorists. This time, not
just Hayden (who was now retired) but five CIA directors – including Obama’s
own director, Leon Panetta objected. George Tenet called to urge against
the memos’ release. So did Porter Goss. So did John Deutch. Hayden says:
“You had CIA directors in a continuous unbroken stream to 1995 calling
saying, ‘Don’t do this.'” In addition to objections from the men who led
the agency for a collective 14 years, the President also heard objections
from the agency’s covert field operatives. A few weeks earlier, Panetta had
arranged for the eight top officials of the Clandestine Service to meet with
the President. It was highly unusual for these clandestine officers to
visit the Oval Office, and they used the opportunity to warn the President
that releasing the memos would put agency operatives at risk. The President
reportedly listened respectfully, and then ignored their advice. With
these actions, Barack Obama arguably did more damage to America ‘s national
security in his first 100 days of office than any President in American
history.

But how many people know this?…. only the few that read this email from
beginning to end.